Animal Rights Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Animal Rights - Research Paper ExampleA school of debaters of living organism rights claim that whether carnal should mother rights should be fixed on which characteristics of brutes have been taken into consideration. But most often some of the debaters fail to consider animals rights in term of human be. Obviously animals rights should be considered in relation to human beings welfare of betterment. Probably, purely ethical perspectives will never be able to reach any unanimous conclusion. Indeed, the attempt to include human being in the issue of animal rights is debated, since some people believe that inclusion of human-animal kind into the debate on animal right violates pureness of ethicality of rights. Indeed, much(prenominal) a tendency fails to consider the fact that the question of animal right arises the very conflict of human interest with animals. Therefore, any attempt to decide whether animals should have rights and (if yes) what rights animals should have nee ds to take human-animal relationship into consideration. Necessarily, if man-animal relationship along the previously mentioned factors is taken into consideration, debaters can reach a conclusion which might not be the unanimous, but will prove to be effective good for animals and also for humanity. Indeed any ethical decision about animal rights from a man-animal relationship perspective, in the very first place, grants animals to have rights, since lack of animals rights endangers not only the animals but also the human life on earth. A Brief write up of Animals Rights Though the debates on animal right began to absorb heat during the 21 century, it has a root in the ancient philosophy. The Book of propagation says that God has given Adam dominion all over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping matter that creepeth upon the earth. (Francione, 1996, p. 45) A creed religiosity most likely views suc h statement as the divine assertion of mans right over animal as the possession of material property. But a more liberal view on this doctrinal assertion considers that mans dominion over animal kingdom does not necessarily infer that man is the ruthless usurper or exploiter of animal kingdom (Francione, 1996, pp. 42-46). Rather he is the cordial guardian of animals and he must know what animals should have what rights. Furthermore, the famous philosopher, Pythagoras argues that animals should have the right to be respected because their souls are reincarnated from human souls and vice versa. Indeed, Pythagorass credit line is mostly doctrinal so it needs to be validated from any ethical perspective. Even Aristotle also advocated such doctrinal view about animal right but he holds a view which is opposite to Pythagoras. He likes to see human beings and animals on the same Great Chain of Being. Indeed, Since Aristotles view is also tied with a rigid ethical framework, it cannot tel l much about what man should do when mans right and animal right conflict with each other (Fellenz, 2007, pp.34-45) In modern Europe, the concept of animal right began to grow during the late 18th century. Arthur Schopenhauer (1998), who was a German philosopher, was a great supporter of this the development of the concept of animal right in England. Though he supports mans practice of eating meat, he comprehended the idea of animal right awakening more and more to a sense that beasts have rights, in proportion as the strange notion is being gradually