Drinking and driving Essay

On Jan.8, 2002, hot seat render subscribe the No nipper go forth stern Act of 2001 (NCLB) that became the education-reform shoot. The No squirt Left laughingstock is roughly sweep education-reform bill since 1965 that made changes to the the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The No sm exclusively fry Left git plays a big part in the deportments of students, parents, teachers, and the future of the educational agreement. No longer content to take into account access to education for traditionally extended students populations, we are now demanding that these students satisfy equally good educations. In other words, administrations are now demanding comparison of attribute. President Bush thinks that all students are title to high quality education, treated equal, fair, and to be safe while at naturalisetime.The No Child Left Behind places significant responsibilities on state educational agencies, check districts, principals, and the teachers. In 2002 the f ederal government returned to the force front in potentially historic fashion. With the passage of No Child Left Behind, supported by bipartism majorities in Congress, the nation committed itself to the achievement of every student in America. The No Child Left Behind in the federal system the United States for every education state and tame districts run out to ascertain the requirements of No Child Left Behind Act that will be held accountable, with the opportunity to improve their down fall. Each state makes their own standards for what a child should know and learn for grades, for math and reading the standards should be substantial first. Every student should be tested by the standards.All school districts should make adequate yearly progress toward meeting their state standards. Schools that fail need all the support they can get to improve their progress. The school or District shall come up with an idea thats expiry to meet all necessary to make higher goals. The No Ch ild Left Behind has a standardize by making surely that all teachers were high. The No CLB Act hasIn the article (Teachers Views on No child left field hand so-and-so) teachers was the no child left stinker law The federal legislation provides considerable discretion to states that can adopt their own academic content standards, choose the tests they will administer, and specify the marginal scores students must obtain to be declared proficient. The no child left fundament law increased the attention to many schools that pay to academic achievement and to disadvantage children that make it punter. As a result, the skills, and knowledge of the subgroups of children that historically carry not increased as apace under many state tests would suggest. Second, no child left roll in the hay has increased the efforts of schools scores, third, adequate yearly progress rules some states increased the migration of see teachers out of school serving high concentrations of low perfo rming students.No child left behind represents that parents of students who are run acrossing title I schools are given the option to transfer their students to another school in the district for improvement status, If a student requested to be transferred shall be allowed to transfer. The No Child Left Behind, has two new educational options, -supplemental educational services and school choice for title I schools for restricting, improvement, and corrective exertion by the options depends on parental decisions. Parents will know their student assessments. If the school needs improvement the parent will be informed. ConclusionThe No Child Left Behind Act is great. Every child should throw away the right to receive an education, and be safe while in school. on that point so many jobs and opportunities will be required to have a college degree in order for a student to have achiever in life they need an education. The No Child Left Behind Act helps and gives students the impossi ble they did not have. The NoChild Left Behind made school districts accountability achievement. ON January 8, 2002 President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind (NCLB), Act the reform bill improves students goals on the state- wide testing, and The No Child Left Behind has admirable goal of improvement in the educational system. President Bush thinks that no child should be left behind and that all children are entitled to education, treated fair and to be safe. No consequence what the student is, their race, where they live, they should be entitled to an equal education.ReferencesAbernathy, S. (2007). No child left behind and the public schools electronic resource / Scott Franklin Abernathy. Ann Arbor University of gelt Press, c2007. Michigan Press. In 2001 the author researcher at Ann Arbor University of President George W. Bushs education reform legislation, the no child left behind act (H.R. 1). Testing and accotability provisions Chubb, J.E. (2009). Learning from no child l eft behind electronic resource how and why the nations most important but The Author research stand ford, California. hoover constitution Murnane, R., Papay, J. (2010). Teachers views on no child left behind support for the principles, concerns about the practices. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 151- 166 Programs, all other discordant Schools Believes that the school should not be accountable for teaching all children well.The No child left behind is to improve all students work. Put students performance in data gives the parents opportunity to see the childs performance. Students that attend low-performing schools start to develop discipline issues, their want to be transferred to a better performing school. School that doesnt need their goals will offer including assoil tutoring, and after school instruction. Randolph, K., & Wilson Younger, D. (2012). Is No Child Left Behind powerful For All Students? Parents dont think so. Online submission. The authors research ers Database ERIC. Since the No child left behind is to discuss the advantage of the core requirements for its implementation. Parents have concerns whether the children are really learning. Zimmer, R., Gill, B., Raquin, Booker, K., Lockwood, J., & Department of education, w.c (2007). State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (Nls-nclb). The author researchers us department ofeducation. The pick up component the no child left behind for the parent children that were go to title I school options for corrective action, improvement, failure achieve toward meeting state standards.